← back to runpane.com

Pane vs Conductor

By Parsa Khazaeepoul, co-founder of Pane. Tested every agent manager in this comparison set in production. .

Conductor is a YC S24-backed macOS app for orchestrating AI coding agents, built by Charlie Holtz and Jackson de Campos — who previously built Melty, an open-source AI code editor. Pane is an open-source, cross-platform agent manager. The differences are fundamental: platform support, agent compatibility, openness, and interaction model.

per-use-case verdict

benchmark data: See how Pane and Conductor compare on memory, disk, and workflow keystrokes in our Q2 2026 measurement run.

feature comparison

paneconductor
platformwindows + mac + linuxmac only (apple silicon only)
agentsany CLI agent — claude code, codex, aider, goose, anythingclaude code + codex only
open sourceyes (AGPL-3.0)no — closed source, proprietary
diff viewerbuilt-in, syntax-highlightedbuilt-in (diff-first model)
git workflowcommit, push, rebase, squash, merge — all keyboardworktrees + PR creation
interaction modelkeyboard-first structurally — navigation is keyboard-only by designGUI-first + ⌘K palette (v0.39.0) + Big Terminal Mode (v0.48.0)
worktree managementautomatic — invisible to the userautomatic (duplicates full repo per workspace)
session persistenceyes — survives restartsyes
pricingfree foreverfree — API key or Claude Pro/Max sub
git provider requirementnone — works with any local reporequires GitHub OAuth (must clone from GitHub)
submodule supportyes (standard git behavior)incompatible (user-reported)
checkpoints / revertgit-native (rebase, squash, reset)turn-by-turn checkpoints with visual revert
integrationsagents connect via MCPs and CLI tools — the terminal is the integration layerbuilt-in github, linear

where pane wins

cross-platform

Conductor only runs on Apple Silicon Macs. Intel Macs aren't even supported. Windows and Linux? "Hopefully soon-ish." Pane runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux today — same UI, same shortcuts, same features.

agent-agnostic

Conductor supports Claude Code and Codex. That's it. Pane supports any CLI agent — Claude Code, Codex, Aider, Goose, or anything that runs in a terminal. A new agent ships tomorrow? Just run it. No waiting for Conductor to add support.

open source

Conductor raised $22M in funding. As a closed-source app, the product roadmap, pricing, and data handling are entirely controlled by the company. Pane is AGPL-3.0 — the code is public and auditable regardless of what happens to the company.

keyboard-first by design, not by addition

Conductor added a command palette (⌘K) in 0.39.0 and Big Terminal Mode in 0.48.0 — both layered onto a click-first GUI. Pane's keyboard model is structural: navigation is keyboard-only by design. Every action has a shortcut. The difference isn't whether there's a command palette — it's whether the tool was built around the keyboard or adapted to one.

no GitHub requirement

Conductor requires repos to be cloned from GitHub — no local-only repos, no GitLab, no Bitbucket, no self-hosted remotes. Pane works with any git repository, anywhere.

what users say about conductor's github requirement

On the Conductor Show HN thread, one evaluator wanted "a simple git worktree manager for my existing, already-checked-out repository" — but had to clone from GitHub and reinstall dependencies. Others flagged that Conductor requests full GitHub OAuth permissions covering code, issues, PRs, wikis, settings, webhooks, and deploy keys.

Pane works on any local repo regardless of remote. No OAuth flow, no clone-from-host requirement, no permission scope. Show HN: Conductor.

where conductor has an edge

background

Conductor was built by Charlie Holtz and Jackson de Campos (YC S24), who previously built Melty, an open-source AI code editor. The team rebuilt the app from scratch for version 0.49.0 ("Allegro") — a signal of engineering ambition.

turn-by-turn checkpoints

Conductor lets you view and revert to specific turns in an agent's conversation. Pane uses standard git operations (rebase, squash, reset) for the same goal.

linear integration

Conductor integrates with Linear for issue-to-PR workflows. Pane is terminal-native — you use whatever tools you want in your terminal tabs.

claude pro/max subscription auth

Conductor explicitly supports Claude Pro and Max subscriptions in addition to API keys. Pane supports this indirectly — any agent running in Pane uses whatever auth that agent supports, including Claude Code's Pro/Max auth flow.

pr cycle walkthrough

conductor

  • 1. Pick issue in Linear panel
  • 2. Spawn agent from issue context
  • 3. Review diff in built-in GUI viewer
  • 4. Merge PR from inside the app

pane

  • 1. Open pane → launch agent in terminal
  • 2. ⌘D to open diff viewer
  • 3. ⌘K → commit and push
  • 4. Done — any remote, any repo

how your conductor setup maps to pane

conductor conceptpane equivalentmigration notes
workspacepane + worktree1:1 — name + branch carry over
repositoryworking directory1:1 — point Pane at the same local path
checkpointno equivalentprivate git refs — not portable; revert history is lost
agent (claude/codex)agent1:1 — direct map
diff viewerbuilt-in diff viewerno data to migrate
checks tab (CI status)no equivalentuse your existing CI tooling in-terminal
setup scriptno equivalentsurface as a README note or first-run terminal command

Today this is manual. A one-click "Import from Conductor" adapter is on the Pane roadmap. Conductor checkpoints (private git refs) do not survive migration — Pane does not yet have turn-by-turn revert.

the bottom line

Conductor is a polished Mac app for managing Claude Code and Codex visually. If you're on an Apple Silicon Mac, all repos are on GitHub, and you only use those two agents, it works well — particularly for its Linear integration and turn-by-turn checkpoints. But if you want cross-platform support, agent flexibility, open source transparency, a keyboard-first workflow, or the ability to use any local git repo — Pane is the tool built for that. See the wider list of conductor alternatives for other options.

frequently asked questions

more comparisons