pane vs terminal multiplexers
tmux, Zellij, and Windows Terminal are good at arranging shells. Pane is for the moment those shells become AI coding agents with branches, diffs, logs, and review decisions.
By Parsa Khazaeepoul, co-founder of Pane. Tested every agent manager in this comparison set in production. .

decision table
| need | use pane | use tmux/zellij/windows terminal |
|---|---|---|
| multiple agents | named sessions and status | manual pane labels and memory |
| worktrees | managed around each session | you create and clean them yourself |
| review | built-in diff and git actions | separate git tool |
| windows | native desktop app | Windows Terminal native; tmux usually via WSL |
bottom line
If your problem is window layout, use a terminal multiplexer. If your problem is running Claude Code, Codex, and other agents without losing track of branches and diffs, use Pane.
For a broader category map, see terminal multiplexers for AI coding agents. This page is the Pane-specific comparison.
frequently asked questions
more comparisons
See also: terminal multiplexers · tmux agent managers
or
Download*
Windows SmartScreen warningDirect downloads can show a SmartScreen warning while Pane is unsigned. Pane is fully open source, so you can audit the code and build from source yourself.1. Click More info2. Click Run anyway3. Continue the installerThe PowerShell install downloads the official release directly and avoids most browser download friction.npm global install
Paste that in PowerShell.Linux