alternatives
Clor alternatives
TL;DR
Clor is a hosted service that runs Claude Code and Codex sessions in Docker containers on your machine or on cloud runners you rent from it, driven from a browser, a Mac app or your phone, with shared memory across agents. People look elsewhere because everything goes through its closed control plane and an account, agent transcripts that contain code are stored on its servers by default, only Claude Code and Codex are managed agents, Windows needs WSL2 plus Docker Desktop, and the company launched as a different product in June 2026 before pivoting to this one in September. Pane is the closest local alternative: any CLI agent in its real terminal and its own worktree, with review and git built in, no account and no cloud service in between, native on Windows and inside WSL. Omnigent and Emdash are the picks if per-task sandboxes or VMs are what you need.
the alternatives
Every tool here runs several coding agents at once, each isolated from the others. The chips show where each one runs: green is native, amber has a catch, red is no.
1.Pane
Best for local parallel agents with no account or cloud.
Each agent runs in its own terminal UI and worktree, with a Changes panel, commit, push and merge buttons, and an orchestrator chat. Remote Pane lets you run the host on your own server. Free, AGPL-3.0.
WindowsWSLmacOSLinux
2.Omnigent
Best for open-source sandboxes and team guardrails.
Databricks' Apache-2.0 server with about a dozen sandbox providers, cost caps, approvals and phone access. Self-hosted, alpha, and needs Python, Node and tmux.
WindowsWSLmacOSLinux
3.Emdash
Best for a VM, pod or container per task from your own scripts.
Apache-2.0 desktop app for 37 agents with remote tasks, SSH projects and issue-tracker intake. No account needed. No WSL mode.
WindowsWSLmacOSLinux
4.Orca
Best for bring-your-own-cloud VMs with a phone app.
MIT, 40 agents in real terminals, per-workspace cloud VMs from repo recipes, SSH hosts and iOS and Android apps. Heavy at about 1 GB installed.
WindowsWSLmacOSLinux
Best for managed cloud workspaces that keep running, on a Mac.
Firecracker VMs that keep working when your laptop closes, deep PR review and team plans. Mac-only, closed source, needs an account.
WindowsWSLmacOSLinux
which one should you pick?
stay with clor if
- → you use Claude Code and Codex together and want them to consult each other
- → your parallel tasks fight over ports, databases or Docker, so you want a container each
- → you want to move work from your laptop to a rented cloud machine and check from a phone
- → you're fine with a hosted control plane holding your transcripts
pick pane if
- → you want everything local, with no account
- → you use agents beyond Claude Code and Codex
- → you want work to stay in your local repo, in worktrees
- → you want git run directly from buttons, not through agent turns
pane vs clor at a glance
yespartly, or with a catchno
| pane10 yes · 0 partly · 0 no | clor3 yes · 5 partly · 2 no | |
|---|---|---|
| basics | ||
| what it is | a desktop app | a hosted control plane with local or cloud runners |
| platforms | ||
| Windows | yes, native (x64 and ARM64) | through WSL2 and Docker Desktop |
| repos inside WSL | yes: agents, terminals and git run in the distro | yes, as the Windows runner |
| macOS | yes | yes, Mac app and CLI |
| Linux | yes (AppImage, .deb) | CLI and browser; desktop app coming |
| agents | ||
| agents | any CLI | Claude Code and Codex |
| everyday work | ||
| isolation per task | a worktree and branch | a Docker container |
| commit, push, merge | buttons and shortcuts | handed to the agent |
| safety and setup | ||
| where sessions live | on your machine | transcripts on Clor's servers by default |
| open source | yes, AGPL-3.0 | no; control plane closed |
| account needed | no | yes |
basics
what it is
pane
clor
a hosted control plane with local or cloud runnersplatforms
Windows
pane
clor
through WSL2 and Docker Desktoprepos inside WSL
pane
clor
yes, as the Windows runnermacOS
pane
clor
yes, Mac app and CLILinux
pane
clor
CLI and browser; desktop app comingagents
agents
pane
clor
Claude Code and Codexeveryday work
isolation per task
pane
clor
a Docker containercommit, push, merge
pane
clor
handed to the agentsafety and setup
where sessions live
pane
clor
transcripts on Clor's servers by defaultopen source
pane
clor
no; control plane closedaccount needed
pane
clor
yesFacts checked on October 3 and 4, 2026 (Clor CLI v1.9.182 and Pane v2.4.157). Rechecked on November 5, 2026 against Clor CLI v1.9.185.
why people look for a clor alternative
An account, a hosted control plane and two agents.
Clor's control plane is a cloud service it runs and doesn't open-source. Every command needs an account, the runner checks in with clor.com every two seconds, and there's no offline orchestration. Agent transcripts, which contain code, are stored in its shared memory by default unless you turn that off per space, and your Claude and OpenAI sign-in tokens are stored and synced to runners.
Only Claude Code and Codex are managed agents; Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenCode and others are plain terminal tabs. On Windows you need WSL2 plus Docker Desktop, and the Linux and Windows desktop apps are "coming soon". Space files are deleted with the space, so work has to be pushed out, and committing goes through agent turns rather than running git directly. The product launched as something else in June 2026 and repositioned in September.
moving from clor to pane
Your agents carry over. Containers become local worktrees, and nothing leaves your machine.
Install Pane, open your repository and create a pane per task: each gets its own worktree and branch, with your .env and agent config folders copied in and its own block of ports in $PANE_PORT, which covers most of the port clashes containers solve. Start Claude Code or Codex with a click, or Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Amp or any other CLI.
Review in the Changes panel and commit, push and merge with shortcuts, without spending agent turns. To have Claude and Codex consult each other, Pane's orchestrator, Sessions, can start one in another pane, send it a question and read back the answer. For a remote machine, Remote Pane runs Pane's host on your own server over SSH, Tailscale or HTTPS. If you need container or VM isolation per task, Omnigent and Emdash cover that.
our verdict
Clor pairs per-task containers with a polished agent and review UI, at the cost of an account and a hosted control plane. If you want parallel agents kept local, any agent, and no account, Pane is the most direct alternative. For self-hosted sandboxes, Omnigent; for VMs per task from your own scripts, Emdash.
how we checked
On October 3, 2026 we installed Clor's CLI 1.9.182 inside WSL2 (Ubuntu 24.04) on Windows 11 and ran its local agent and review panes with Claude Code; its hosted spaces sit behind a sign-in we don't create for these tests, so those facts come from its docs, pricing and FAQ. Pane, Omnigent, Emdash and Orca ran on the same PC. Conductor's facts come from its docs and pricing.
Facts about each product come from its own docs, release notes and, where public, source code, checked on October 3 and 4, 2026.
- What we ran
- → Pane 2.4.155 on Windows 11, native and WSL2 (Ubuntu 24.04) repos
- → Clor CLI 1.9.182 in WSL2 on the same PC, local agent and review panes, October 3, 2026
- Who wrote this
- We make Pane, so we have a stake in this. We tried to be fair: Clor's strengths are listed as plainly as Pane's, every claim was checked against the product itself or its docs and source, and the screenshots are unedited captures from our own runs.
- Corrections
- If anything here is wrong or out of date, tell us and we'll fix it and update the date at the top. Open an issue on GitHub
- Sources
frequently asked questions
more comparisons
By Parsa Khazaeepoul, co-founder of Pane. .