comparison · hands-on
Pane vs Ghostex
TL;DR
Ghostex and Pane are both free, open-source desktop apps that run each agent's real CLI, on Windows, inside WSL, macOS and Linux. Ghostex draws a chat view over each agent's terminal, keeps sessions alive in its own daemon after you quit, and adds a browser, VS Code, a Kanban, remote hosts, cloud boxes and an Android app. Pane gives every task its own worktree by default, shows the agent's own terminal, and keeps the surface small: a Changes panel, git shortcuts, a built-in browser and an orchestrator. Pick Ghostex for the most features and persistent sessions; pick Pane for worktree isolation, a smaller app and Intel Mac builds.
which one should you pick?
pick ghostex if
- → you want a polished chat view over Claude Code, Codex and Cursor, with the terminal one key away
- → you want agents to keep running after you quit the app
- → you want a browser, VS Code, Kanban and scheduled runs in the same window
- → you want an Android app today
pick pane if
- → you want a worktree per task by default, so agents never share a checkout
- → you want a smaller app with one settings window
- → you're on an Intel Mac
- → you want git actions that tell you when they fail
at a glance
yespartly, or with a catchno
| pane11 yes · 2 partly · 0 no | ghostex9 yes · 4 partly · 0 no | |
|---|---|---|
| basics | ||
| what it is | desktop app: real terminals for agents, side by side | native app over a daemon: persistent terminals with a chat view |
| made by | Dcouple | a solo developer |
| license | AGPL-3.0, free | MIT, free |
| release pace | most days | a release or two most days |
| platforms | ||
| Windows | yes (x64 and ARM64) | yes (x64 and ARM64), unsigned |
| repos inside WSL | yes: agents, terminals and git run in the distro | yes, WSL mode |
| macOS | yes, Apple Silicon and Intel | Apple Silicon only |
| Linux | yes (x64 and ARM64) | yes (x64 and ARM64) |
| agents | ||
| agents | any CLI | any CLI; chat view for about 20 |
| how agents run | the agent's own terminal UI | real terminal with a chat view on top |
| everyday work | ||
| worktree per task | yes, on by default | available; one shared checkout by default |
| review and commit | Changes panel, commit, push, merge | commit dialog with AI messages, multiple commits, PRs |
| agents after you quit | sessions resume when you reopen | keep running in its daemon |
| built-in views | browser | browser, VS Code, Kanban, Linear and Jira |
| remote and teams | ||
| other machines | Remote Pane host over SSH, Tailscale or HTTPS | SSH hosts and cloud boxes |
| phone | iOS and Android app coming soon; browser app via Remote Pane today | Android app; iOS on TestFlight |
| safety and setup | ||
| settings surface | one settings window | 451 settings |
| account needed | no | no |
basics
what it is
pane
ghostex
native app over a daemon: persistent terminals with a chat viewmade by
pane
ghostex
a solo developerlicense
pane
ghostex
MIT, freerelease pace
pane
ghostex
a release or two most daysplatforms
Windows
pane
ghostex
yes (x64 and ARM64), unsignedrepos inside WSL
pane
ghostex
yes, WSL modemacOS
pane
ghostex
Apple Silicon onlyLinux
pane
ghostex
yes (x64 and ARM64)agents
agents
pane
ghostex
any CLI; chat view for about 20how agents run
pane
ghostex
real terminal with a chat view on topeveryday work
worktree per task
pane
ghostex
available; one shared checkout by defaultreview and commit
pane
ghostex
commit dialog with AI messages, multiple commits, PRsagents after you quit
pane
ghostex
keep running in its daemonbuilt-in views
pane
ghostex
browser, VS Code, Kanban, Linear and Jiraremote and teams
other machines
pane
ghostex
SSH hosts and cloud boxesphone
pane
ghostex
Android app; iOS on TestFlightsafety and setup
settings surface
pane
ghostex
451 settingsaccount needed
pane
ghostex
noFacts checked on October 3 and 4, 2026: Ghostex v10.11.1 (tested 10.9.1) and Pane v2.4.157. Rechecked against Ghostex's site, docs and releases on November 5, 2026: Ghostex v10.47.0.
what it's like to use
We gave both apps the same small job in a test repo: add a --version flag to a CLI, then review the change. Here's what you see. Green notes work well, blue ones are nice touches, amber ones are confusing, and red ones are missing or broken.
1.agents at work
Pane
Ghostex
2.reviewing the change
Pane
Ghostex
the real difference: shared checkout or worktree per task
Ghostex sessions share a checkout unless you set up worktrees. Every Pane is its own worktree.
In our run, Ghostex's parallel sessions all worked in the same project folder, so their changes mixed, and we couldn't find Add Worktree from any menu. Worktrees exist in Ghostex, but they aren't the default path.
In Pane, creating a pane creates a worktree and branch, copies in your .env and agent config, and gives the pane its own port block. Several agents on one repo never touch each other's files, and each pane's Changes panel shows only its own work.
features and pace
Ghostex does a lot, with 451 settings. Pane does less, with one settings window.
Ghostex bundles a lot: a chat view with side questions and rewind, persistent sessions in its daemon, a browser, VS Code, a Kanban, Linear and Jira, scheduled automations, SSH hosts, cloud boxes and an Android app. It's almost entirely one developer's work, shipping a release or two most days, with 451 settings and regressions between versions; two of our commits failed with no message.
Pane focuses on agents, worktrees, review and git, with a built-in browser and Sessions, an orchestrator that starts and steers agents in other panes. It has one settings window and releases often, but its core stays put.
when you quit
Ghostex keeps agents running. Pane brings them back when you reopen.
Ghostex's daemon keeps each agent alive when you quit the window, so long jobs carry on. Pane restores layout, tabs, scrollback and agent sessions when you reopen it, so you pick up where you left off.
our verdict
Ghostex is one of the most feature-packed free agent apps, and its persistent sessions are excellent. If you want each task isolated in its own worktree, a smaller app, and builds for every platform including Intel Macs, Pane is the better fit.
how we checked
On October 4, 2026 we ran Ghostex 10.9.1 on Windows 11 in native and WSL modes (Ubuntu 24.04) with Claude Code and Codex in parallel, reviewed and committed a change, and ran Pane 2.4.155 on the same PC.
Facts about each product come from its own docs, changelog, issue tracker and source code, checked on October 3 and 4, 2026. We rechecked Ghostex's releases and README on November 5, 2026 (v10.47.0).
- What we ran
- → Pane 2.4.155 on Windows 11, native and WSL2 (Ubuntu 24.04) repos
- → Ghostex 10.9.1 on the same PC in native and WSL modes
- → The same small task in both
- Who wrote this
- We make Pane, so we have a stake in this. We tried to be fair: Ghostex's strengths are listed as plainly as Pane's, every claim was checked against the product itself or its docs and source, and the screenshots are unedited captures from our own runs.
- Corrections
- If anything here is wrong or out of date, tell us and we'll fix it and update the date at the top. Open an issue on GitHub
- Sources
frequently asked questions
more comparisons
By Parsa Khazaeepoul, co-founder of Pane. .