comparison · hands-on
Pane vs Kandev
TL;DR
Kandev and Pane are both free and AGPL-3.0, and both give each task its own git worktree. Kandev is a server with a web UI and a desktop shell: a Kanban where each card moves through steps like plan, build, review and PR, with a different agent per step, human gates, and runners on Docker, SSH or Kubernetes. Pane is a desktop app where each agent runs in its real terminal, several side by side, with a Changes panel, git shortcuts and an orchestrator chat. Pick Kandev for structured pipelines and running agents on servers; pick Pane for hands-on parallel work, especially on native Windows, where Kandev's agents failed to start in our test.
which one should you pick?
pick kandev if
- → you want a gated pipeline (plan, implement, review, PR, CI fix) with a different agent per step
- → you run agents on servers, containers or Kubernetes rather than your laptop
- → you want a self-hosted team board you can reach from your phone
- → you work on macOS, Linux or inside WSL
pick pane if
- → you develop natively on Windows, or mix Windows and WSL repos
- → you want each agent's own terminal UI rather than a chat
- → you'd rather install a desktop app than run a web server
- → you want fewer settings to learn
at a glance
yespartly, or with a catchno
| pane11 yes · 3 partly · 0 no | kandev9 yes · 5 partly · 0 no | |
|---|---|---|
| basics | ||
| what it is | desktop app: real terminals for agents, side by side | server with a web UI and desktop shell: an agent Kanban |
| license | AGPL-3.0, free | AGPL-3.0, free |
| maturity | v2.4 | v0.98, releases every few weeks |
| platforms | ||
| Windows | yes (x64 and ARM64) | x64, unsigned; agents failed to start in our test |
| repos inside WSL | yes, in the same app | a separate install inside WSL |
| macOS | yes, signed | yes, unsigned builds |
| Linux | yes (AppImage, .deb) | yes (AppImage, .deb, .rpm) |
| agents | ||
| agents | any CLI | about 24 through ACP; others as passthrough |
| how agents run | the agent's own terminal UI | an ACP chat, or a passthrough terminal |
| where agents run | your machine, or a Remote Pane host | local, Docker, SSH, Kubernetes, Sprites |
| everyday work | ||
| worktree per task | yes | yes |
| workflow steps | Sessions orchestrator | Kanban pipelines with gates and templates |
| review | Changes panel, commit, push, merge | diff with reviewed tracking, comments to the agent, commit and PR |
| remote and teams | ||
| phone | iOS and Android app coming soon; browser app via Remote Pane today | responsive web UI |
| safety and setup | ||
| network default | local app | CLI binds all interfaces, no auth |
| account needed | no | no |
basics
what it is
pane
kandev
server with a web UI and desktop shell: an agent Kanbanlicense
pane
kandev
AGPL-3.0, freematurity
pane
kandev
v0.98, releases every few weeksplatforms
Windows
pane
kandev
x64, unsigned; agents failed to start in our testrepos inside WSL
pane
kandev
a separate install inside WSLmacOS
pane
kandev
yes, unsigned buildsLinux
pane
kandev
yes (AppImage, .deb, .rpm)agents
agents
pane
kandev
about 24 through ACP; others as passthroughhow agents run
pane
kandev
an ACP chat, or a passthrough terminalwhere agents run
pane
kandev
local, Docker, SSH, Kubernetes, Spriteseveryday work
worktree per task
pane
kandev
yesworkflow steps
pane
kandev
Kanban pipelines with gates and templatesreview
pane
kandev
diff with reviewed tracking, comments to the agent, commit and PRremote and teams
phone
pane
kandev
responsive web UIsafety and setup
network default
pane
kandev
CLI binds all interfaces, no authaccount needed
pane
kandev
noFacts checked on October 3 and 4, 2026: Kandev v0.97.0 (tested 0.96.0) and Pane v2.4.157. Rechecked against Kandev's site, docs and releases on November 5, 2026: Kandev v0.98.0.
what it's like to use
We gave both apps the same small job in a test repo: add a --version flag to a CLI, then review the change. Here's what you see. Green notes work well, blue ones are nice touches, amber ones are confusing, and red ones are missing or broken.
1.agents at work
Pane
Kandev
2.reviewing the change
Pane
Kandev
the real difference: pipeline or panes
Kandev runs a process. Pane runs agents you steer.
Kandev is built around a gated process: a card moves through steps, each step can use a different agent and prompt, and humans approve the hand-offs. It can wake agents on pull request events, run them in containers, on SSH hosts or in Kubernetes, and serve a team board you reach from a browser or phone. It has a big surface: 21 settings pages, and many features marked limited or experimental.
Pane is built around panes: each task is a worktree with the agent's own terminal, extra terminals and a Changes panel, and you watch several at once. For a plan, build, review sequence, its orchestrator, Sessions, can start a planner in one pane, hand the plan to an implementer in another and ask a third agent to review.
windows and wsl
Kandev works best inside WSL. Pane works natively and with WSL repos in one app.
Kandev's maintainers called its Windows support subpar in May 2026. On native Windows in our test, both agents failed their checks and Claude Code wouldn't start; the full journey only worked inside WSL, which is a separate Kandev installation you open in a browser. Pane ships native x64 and ARM64 Windows builds, and runs agents, terminals and git inside WSL for repos that live there, side by side with Windows repos.
agents
Kandev prefers ACP chat. Pane shows each agent's own terminal.
Kandev drives most agents through the Agent Client Protocol as a structured chat, with Claude Code needing an extra ACP bridge, and offers the agent's own terminal UI as a passthrough mode that loses the board's structured features. Pane runs every agent's own CLI in a real terminal, with no bridge to install.
our verdict
Kandev is one of the most complete self-hosted agent boards, ideal for structured pipelines and server-side runners. If you want a desktop app where every agent runs in its real terminal and Windows and WSL both just work, Pane is the better fit.
how we checked
On October 3 and 4, 2026 we ran Kandev 0.96.0 inside WSL2 (Ubuntu 24.04) with a real Claude Code task through review and commit, and installed its native Windows CLI and desktop app, where agents failed to start. Pane 2.4.155 ran on the same Windows 11 PC.
Facts about each product come from its own docs, release notes, issue tracker and source code, checked on the same dates.
- What we ran
- → Pane 2.4.155 on Windows 11, native and WSL2 (Ubuntu 24.04) repos
- → Kandev 0.96.0 in WSL2, plus its native Windows CLI and desktop app
- → The same small task in both
- Who wrote this
- We make Pane, so we have a stake in this. We tried to be fair: Kandev's strengths are listed as plainly as Pane's, every claim was checked against the product itself or its docs and source, and the screenshots are unedited captures from our own runs.
- Corrections
- If anything here is wrong or out of date, tell us and we'll fix it and update the date at the top. Open an issue on GitHub
- Sources
frequently asked questions
more comparisons
By Parsa Khazaeepoul, co-founder of Pane. .