comparison · hands-on
Pane vs Silo
TL;DR
Silo (getsilo.dev) is a free, MIT-licensed lightweight editor that keeps every project open with its own terminals and agents running in the background, and brings them back after a reboot with each agent's resume command. Pane is a free, AGPL-3.0 desktop app that gives every task its own git worktree and real agent terminal, with a Changes panel, git shortcuts and an orchestrator. Silo is about keeping many projects alive; Pane is about running several isolated tasks in one project. Pick Silo on a Mac or Linux if you juggle projects by hand; pick Pane for parallel tasks that don't collide, and for Windows and WSL.
which one should you pick?
pick silo if
- → you work on macOS or Linux and juggle several projects at once
- → you run agents by hand in terminals and want them back after a reboot
- → you want a light, hackable editor with an extension SDK
- → you don't need worktrees or a pull request flow
pick pane if
- → you want a worktree and branch per task, so agents never collide
- → you're on Windows, or your code lives inside WSL
- → you want commit, push and merge from one place
- → you want an orchestrator that starts and steers other agents
at a glance
yespartly, or with a catchno
| pane12 yes · 0 partly · 0 no | silo6 yes · 3 partly · 3 no | |
|---|---|---|
| basics | ||
| what it is | desktop app: real terminals for agents, a worktree per task | a light editor that keeps every project's terminals alive |
| made by | Dcouple | a solo developer |
| license | AGPL-3.0, free | MIT, free |
| maturity | v2.4 | v0.72, four months old |
| platforms | ||
| Windows | yes (x64 and ARM64) | experimental (x64) |
| repos inside WSL | yes: agents, terminals and git run in the distro | no; a WSL repo failed in our test |
| macOS | yes | yes, signed and notarized |
| Linux | yes (x64 and ARM64) | yes (x64) |
| agents | ||
| agents | any CLI | any CLI in a terminal; ACP chat in beta |
| agents that run agents | Sessions | no |
| everyday work | ||
| worktree per task | yes, on by default | no |
| review and git | Changes panel, commit, push, merge | Git panel with diff, stage and commit |
| after a restart | layout, scrollback and agent sessions return | projects, terminals and agent resume return |
| code editor | open in your own editor | built in (no LSP) |
| safety and setup | ||
| analytics | on by default; one switch in Settings | anonymous update-check counts |
| account needed | no | no |
basics
what it is
pane
silo
a light editor that keeps every project's terminals alivemade by
pane
silo
a solo developerlicense
pane
silo
MIT, freematurity
pane
silo
v0.72, four months oldplatforms
Windows
pane
silo
experimental (x64)repos inside WSL
pane
silo
no; a WSL repo failed in our testmacOS
pane
silo
yes, signed and notarizedLinux
pane
silo
yes (x64)agents
agents
pane
silo
any CLI in a terminal; ACP chat in betaagents that run agents
pane
silo
noeveryday work
worktree per task
pane
silo
noreview and git
pane
silo
Git panel with diff, stage and commitafter a restart
pane
silo
projects, terminals and agent resume returncode editor
pane
silo
built in (no LSP)safety and setup
analytics
pane
silo
anonymous update-check countsaccount needed
pane
silo
noFacts checked on October 3 and 4, 2026: Silo v0.72.0 and Pane v2.4.157.
what it's like to use
We gave both apps the same small job in a test repo: add a --version flag to a CLI, then review the change. Here's what you see. Green notes work well, blue ones are nice touches, amber ones are confusing, and red ones are missing or broken.
1.agents at work
Pane
Silo
2.reviewing the change
Pane
Silo
the real difference: many projects or many tasks
Silo keeps many projects alive. Pane runs many isolated tasks.
Silo's idea is one window for every project, with each project's terminals and agents still running when you switch away, and coming back after a reboot with resume commands. Agents inside a project share its checkout, and there's no way to fan one prompt out to several agents or create pull requests.
Pane's idea is a pane per task: a worktree and branch, the agent's own terminal, extra terminals, and a Changes panel. Several agents can work on one repo without touching each other's files, and Sessions can start and steer them for you. Pane also restores layout, scrollback and agent sessions when you reopen it.
windows and wsl
Silo's Windows build is experimental. Pane is native on Windows and handles WSL repos.
Silo's README labels the Windows build experimental. In our test it defaulted to cmd.exe, showed Mac shortcut symbols, couldn't open a repo through a \\wsl$ path, and its Git panel got stuck on Loading after an error. Linux and Windows builds are x64 only.
Pane ships native x64 and ARM64 Windows builds, and for a repo inside WSL it runs the agent, terminals and git inside the distro.
editing code
Silo is an editor. Pane hands off to yours.
Silo includes a Monaco editor, file tree and search, though its own docs say it's below VS Code and Zed, with no language server. Pane doesn't try to be an editor: open any pane's worktree in VS Code, Cursor or a custom command with one click.
our verdict
Silo is a pleasant, light way to keep many projects' agents alive on a Mac or Linux. If you want parallel tasks isolated in their own worktrees, a review and git flow, an orchestrator, and first-class Windows and WSL, Pane is the better fit.
how we checked
On October 3 and 4, 2026 we ran Silo 0.72.0 on Windows 11 with Claude Code and Codex, reviewed and committed a change, and tried a WSL repo and the Linux build under WSLg. Pane 2.4.155 ran on the same PC, including a repo inside WSL2 (Ubuntu 24.04).
Facts about each product come from its own docs, changelog, issue tracker and source code, checked on the same dates.
- What we ran
- → Pane 2.4.155 on Windows 11, native and WSL2 (Ubuntu 24.04) repos
- → Silo 0.72.0 on the same PC with Claude Code and Codex
- → The same small task in both
- Who wrote this
- We make Pane, so we have a stake in this. We tried to be fair: Silo's strengths are listed as plainly as Pane's, every claim was checked against the product itself or its docs and source, and the screenshots are unedited captures from our own runs.
- Corrections
- If anything here is wrong or out of date, tell us and we'll fix it and update the date at the top. Open an issue on GitHub
- Sources
frequently asked questions
more comparisons
By Parsa Khazaeepoul, co-founder of Pane. .