comparison · hands-on
Pane vs Waku
TL;DR
Waku (waku.sh) is a free, GPL-3.0 native app that puts Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, OpenCode, Amp, Pi and five other agents behind one fast, polished chat window, with rewind and fork that undo code and conversation together and a usage dashboard across agents. Pane is a free, AGPL-3.0 desktop app that runs any CLI agent in its own terminal and worktree, several side by side, with a Changes panel, git shortcuts and an orchestrator. Waku is built for one task at a time in a beautiful chat; Pane is built for many tasks at once. Pick Waku if you want the calmest single-agent window; pick Pane for parallel work, WSL repos and any agent.
which one should you pick?
pick waku if
- → you want the fastest, calmest chat window over Codex, Claude Code or OpenCode
- → you mostly work on one task at a time
- → you want rewind that undoes code and conversation together
- → you want a usage and limits dashboard across agents
pick pane if
- → you run several agents at once and want to see them side by side
- → you want an orchestrator that starts and steers other agents
- → your code lives inside WSL
- → you use Gemini CLI, Aider, Copilot CLI or any other CLI
at a glance
yespartly, or with a catchno
| pane12 yes · 2 partly · 0 no | waku6 yes · 6 partly · 2 no | |
|---|---|---|
| basics | ||
| what it is | desktop app: real terminals for agents, side by side | native app: one chat window over many agents |
| made by | Dcouple | a solo developer (EGOIST) |
| license | AGPL-3.0, free | GPL-3.0, free |
| maturity | v2.4 | v0.1, first commit July 2026 |
| platforms | ||
| Windows | yes (x64 and ARM64) | yes (x64 and ARM64), unsigned |
| repos inside WSL | yes: agents, terminals and git run in the distro | not supported |
| macOS | yes, Apple Silicon and Intel | Apple Silicon only |
| Linux | yes (AppImage, .deb) | yes (tarball) |
| agents | ||
| agents | any CLI | 11 built in; no Gemini CLI or Aider |
| how agents run | the agent's own terminal UI | Waku's chat view over each agent's protocol |
| agents that run agents | Sessions | no |
| usage meters | Claude Code and Codex | across agents |
| everyday work | ||
| agents on screen | several, in split tabs | one transcript at a time |
| worktree per task | yes, on by default, cleaned up on archive | optional, undocumented, no cleanup |
| review and git | Changes panel, commit, push, merge | Review panel by turn; commit with an AI message |
| undo an agent turn | restore uncommitted changes | rewind code and chat together |
| safety and setup | ||
| account needed | no | no |
basics
what it is
pane
waku
native app: one chat window over many agentsmade by
pane
waku
a solo developer (EGOIST)license
pane
waku
GPL-3.0, freematurity
pane
waku
v0.1, first commit July 2026platforms
Windows
pane
waku
yes (x64 and ARM64), unsignedrepos inside WSL
pane
waku
not supportedmacOS
pane
waku
Apple Silicon onlyLinux
pane
waku
yes (tarball)agents
agents
pane
waku
11 built in; no Gemini CLI or Aiderhow agents run
pane
waku
Waku's chat view over each agent's protocolagents that run agents
pane
waku
nousage meters
pane
waku
across agentseveryday work
agents on screen
pane
waku
one transcript at a timeworktree per task
pane
waku
optional, undocumented, no cleanupreview and git
pane
waku
Review panel by turn; commit with an AI messageundo an agent turn
pane
waku
rewind code and chat togethersafety and setup
account needed
pane
waku
noFacts checked on October 3 and 4, 2026: Waku v0.1.20 and Pane v2.4.157.
what it's like to use
We gave both apps the same small job in a test repo: add a --version flag to a CLI, then review the change. Here's what you see. Green notes work well, blue ones are nice touches, amber ones are confusing, and red ones are missing or broken.
1.agents at work
Pane
Waku
2.reviewing the change
Pane
Waku
the real difference: one chat or many terminals
Waku polishes a single conversation. Pane runs many agents side by side.
Waku shows one transcript at a time, with an instant native UI, tidy tool-call rows, and rewind and fork that undo code and conversation together. There's no grid, fan-out, orchestration or task board, and in our test finished, idle and waiting tasks looked the same in the sidebar.
Pane is built for parallel work: a pane per task with its own worktree, the agent's own terminal and a Changes panel, split tabs to watch several at once, and Sessions to start and steer agents in other panes. To undo an agent's work you restore its uncommitted changes in the pane, or discard the pane and its worktree.
agents
Waku speaks each agent's protocol. Pane runs any terminal command.
Waku talks to Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, OpenCode, Amp, Pi and others through their structured protocols, which is what makes rewind and its chat possible; Gemini CLI, Copilot CLI and Aider aren't available, and Amp and Pi run only in full access. Pane runs the agent's own CLI in a real terminal, so any agent works, with Claude Code, Codex and Cursor one click away.
windows and wsl
Waku doesn't support WSL. Pane runs agents inside the distro.
Waku runs natively on Windows (unsigned), and its Mac build is Apple Silicon only. In our test, creating a worktree on a WSL repo failed. Pane opens WSL repos from the Windows app and runs the agent, terminals and git inside the distro, and has builds for Intel and Apple Silicon Macs.
our verdict
Waku is one of the nicest native chat windows over coding agents, if you work one task at a time. For running many agents in parallel, each in its own worktree and terminal, with any agent and WSL, Pane is the better fit.
how we checked
On October 3 and 4, 2026 we ran Waku 0.1.20 on Windows 11 with Claude Code and Codex, three tasks in three worktrees, reviewed and committed a change, tried a WSL repo, and ran Pane 2.4.155 on the same PC.
Facts about each product come from its own docs, changelog, issue tracker and source code, checked on the same dates.
- What we ran
- → Pane 2.4.155 on Windows 11, native and WSL2 (Ubuntu 24.04) repos
- → Waku 0.1.20 on the same PC with Claude Code and Codex
- → The same small task in both
- Who wrote this
- We make Pane, so we have a stake in this. We tried to be fair: Waku's strengths are listed as plainly as Pane's, every claim was checked against the product itself or its docs and source, and the screenshots are unedited captures from our own runs.
- Corrections
- If anything here is wrong or out of date, tell us and we'll fix it and update the date at the top. Open an issue on GitHub
- Sources
frequently asked questions
more comparisons
By Parsa Khazaeepoul, co-founder of Pane. .