What's the difference between Pane and Reliant?

Reliant is its own agent driven by YAML workflows through its cloud. Pane runs the agent CLIs you already use, locally, each in its own terminal and worktree.

Can Reliant run Claude Code or Codex?

Not as agents. It can sign in to Claude or ChatGPT as model providers for its own agent, but it doesn't run their CLIs. Pane runs both as they are.

Does Reliant need an account?

Yes, you sign in before you open a project. Pane needs no account.

Can Pane run the same task with several agents?

Yes. Create up to five panes from the same base branch, give each agent the same prompt, and compare their diffs.

Are Pane and Reliant open source?

Pane is AGPL-3.0. Reliant is source-available under the BSL, converting to Apache-2.0 after four years.

Does my code go through Reliant's servers?

Reliant's agent loop and model calls go through its servers. In Pane, agents talk only to their own providers.

comparison

Pane vs Reliant

TL;DR

Reliant (reliantlabs.io) is a desktop app and cloud service with its own coding agent, where you write your process as YAML workflows: loops, joins, approval gates, test-driven cycles and "three agents build it, a reviewer picks", with durable runs that survive laptop sleep. Pane is a free, open-source desktop app that runs the agents you already use, Claude Code, Codex and any other CLI, locally in their own terminals and worktrees, with an orchestrator that can split, compare and review work across panes. Pick Reliant if you want to encode an AI development process as code and are happy with its agent and cloud; pick Pane if you want your own agents, locally, with no account.

Download*

Windows SmartScreen warningDirect downloads can show a SmartScreen warning while Pane is unsigned. Pane is fully open source, so you can audit the code and build from source yourself.1. Click More info2. Click Run anyway3. Continue the installerThe PowerShell install downloads the official release directly and avoids most browser download friction.npm global install

Paste that in PowerShell.Linux

which one should you pick?

pick reliant if

→ you want to encode your AI dev process as versioned YAML workflows with loops and gates
→ you're happy with Reliant's own agent on your keys or subscriptions
→ you want runs to survive laptop sleep on hosted machines
→ a cloud service between you and the model is fine

pick pane if

→ you want to keep using Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or OpenCode as they are
→ your code and prompts shouldn't pass through another company's servers
→ you want no account and open source
→ your code lives inside WSL

at a glance

yespartly, or with a catchno

	pane11 yes · 1 partly · 0 no	reliant5 yes · 4 partly · 3 no
basics
what it is	desktop app: your agents in real terminals, side by side	desktop app and cloud: its own agent in YAML workflows
license	AGPL-3.0, open source	BSL 1.1, source-available
price	free	free with your own key or subscription; cloud machines from $20/mo
platforms
Windows	yes (x64 and ARM64)	yes, signed
repos inside WSL	yes: agents, terminals and git run in the distro	not documented
macOS	yes	yes
Linux	yes (AppImage, .deb)	yes
agents
agents	any CLI, including Claude Code and Codex	its own agent only, on many model providers
where the agent runs	on your machine	through Reliant's cloud
reads AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md	the agents read their own files	no; uses reliant.md
everyday work
multi-step workflows	Sessions orchestrator and runpane CLI	YAML workflows with loops, joins, gates and tests
same task, several agents	up to five panes from one base	parallel-compete workflow with a reviewer
worktree per task	yes, on by default	yes, as workspaces you create
safety and setup
account needed	no	yes

basics

what it is

pane

desktop app: your agents in real terminals, side by side

reliant

desktop app and cloud: its own agent in YAML workflows

license

pane

AGPL-3.0, open source

reliant

BSL 1.1, source-available

price

pane

free

reliant

free with your own key or subscription; cloud machines from $20/mo

platforms

Windows

pane

yes (x64 and ARM64)

reliant

yes, signed

repos inside WSL

pane

yes: agents, terminals and git run in the distro

reliant

not documented

macOS

pane

yes

reliant

yes

Linux

pane

yes (AppImage, .deb)

reliant

yes

agents

pane

any CLI, including Claude Code and Codex

reliant

its own agent only, on many model providers

where the agent runs

pane

on your machine

reliant

through Reliant's cloud

reads AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md

pane

the agents read their own files

reliant

no; uses reliant.md

everyday work

multi-step workflows

pane

Sessions orchestrator and runpane CLI

reliant

YAML workflows with loops, joins, gates and tests

same task, several agents

pane

up to five panes from one base

reliant

parallel-compete workflow with a reviewer

worktree per task

pane

yes, on by default

reliant

yes, as workspaces you create

safety and setup

account needed

pane

reliant

yes

Facts checked on October 3 and 4, 2026: Reliant v1.7.16 and Pane v2.4.157. Rechecked against Reliant's site, docs and releases on November 5, 2026: Reliant v1.8.18.

the real difference: its agent and its cloud, or yours

Reliant is its own agent with a workflow engine. Pane runs the agents you already use.

Reliant isn't an orchestrator of Claude Code or Codex CLIs: it runs its own agent loop against model providers you connect, and its agent loop, model calls and terminal connection go through Reliant's servers. What you get in return is a real workflow engine: YAML workflows with loops, joins, routers, approval gates and tests, versioned in your repo and run durably on Temporal, so a multi-step process keeps going across laptop sleep.

Pane runs Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and any other CLI exactly as they are, locally, each in its own terminal and worktree, with their own settings, AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md. For workflow-style runs, Sessions can start a planner, hand the plan to implementers in other panes and ask another agent to review, and the runpane CLI lets you script loops with your own cron.

account, licence and maturity

Reliant needs an account, is source-available and pre-launch. Pane is open source with no account.

Reliant's onboarding requires a cloud account and a model provider before you can open a project. It's licensed under the Business Source License, converting to Apache-2.0 four years after each release. Its own repo says it hasn't launched, and mid-2026 builds failed to render or pointed at a dead backend. Pane is AGPL-3.0, free, with no account.

our verdict

Reliant's workflows-as-code idea is genuinely interesting for teams that want a repeatable AI development process, if its agent and cloud suit you. If you want to run the agents you already use, locally and in parallel, Pane is the better fit.

how we checked

On October 4, 2026 we installed Reliant 1.7.16 on Windows 11 and ran its tools daemon in WSL2 (Ubuntu 24.04); onboarding requires a cloud account and a model provider before you can open a project, which we don't connect for these tests, so the rest comes from its docs, release notes, licence and source. Pane 2.4.155 ran on the same PC.

Facts about each product come from its own docs, release notes, issue tracker and source code, checked on October 3 and 4, 2026.

What we ran

→ Pane 2.4.155 on Windows 11, native and WSL2 (Ubuntu 24.04) repos
→ Reliant 1.7.16 installed on the same PC up to its account and provider wall

Who wrote this

We make Pane, so we have a stake in this. We tried to be fair: Reliant's strengths are listed as plainly as Pane's, every claim was checked against the product itself or its docs and source, and the screenshots are unedited captures from our own runs.

Corrections

If anything here is wrong or out of date, tell us and we'll fix it and update the date at the top. Open an issue on GitHub

Sources

frequently asked questions

more comparisons

Pane vs Kandev Pane vs Omnigent Pane vs Agent Orchestrator

Download*

Paste that in PowerShell.Linux

By Parsa Khazaeepoul, co-founder of Pane. Last reviewed November 5, 2026.